<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Small Aperture &#187; Camera Review Round-ups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smallaperture.com/category/reviews/camera-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smallaperture.com</link>
	<description>Photography news with a greater depth of field</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:42:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Canon PowerShot S95 reviews round-up</title>
		<link>http://smallaperture.com/canon-s95-review/</link>
		<comments>http://smallaperture.com/canon-s95-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniela Bowker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera Review Round-ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon PowerShot S95]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compact camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smallaperture.com/?p=1278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been poking around the reviews of the Canon PowerShot S95 that was released last week and I have to say that I&#8217;m struggling to find anyone who has a bad word to say about it. With a 10 mega-pixel sensor, a 28-105mm f/2-4.9 lens, fully manual and RAW capable shooting, and an HD video [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been poking around the reviews of the Canon PowerShot S95 that was released last week and I have to say that I&#8217;m struggling to find anyone who has a bad word to say about it. With a 10 mega-pixel sensor, a 28-105mm f/2-4.9 lens, fully manual and RAW capable shooting, and an HD video mode, Canon has built on the S95&#8217;s predecessor (the S90) to provide a pocket-sized picture-making-machine of tactile sleekness and wonder that might appeal to the dSLR user. <span id="more-1278"></span></p>
<p>So what is it that dSLR users do actually look for in a compact camera? Will Burrard-Lucas summarises it neatly:</p>
<ul>
<li>image quality should be compromised as little as possible</li>
<li>the camera needs to allow full manual control</li>
<li>it needs to be able to fit into a pocket, otherwise you might as well take a dSLR.</li>
</ul>
<p>And yes, the reviews really do suggest that Canon has nailed this one, with low-light sensitivity, hybrid image stabilisation, fully manual mode, the groovy control ring on the front of the camera, and measurements at 100 × 58 × 30 mm. </p>
<p><strong>PhotographyBlog says</strong> &#8216;The list of improvements [from the S90] may be relatively small, but they add up to make the Canon S95 one of the most compelling pocket cameras on the market.&#8217; <a href="http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/canon_powershot_s95_review/">Read exactly why they think it&#8217;s one of the most compelling compacts around.</a></p>
<p><strong>Digital Camera says</strong> &#8216;Overall the Canon PowerShot S95 is a brilliant digital camera which definitely carries on from the ever successful Canon PowerShot S90.&#8217; <a href="http://www.digital-camera.com/1902/the-canon-powershot-s95-gives-a-stellar-performance.html">Digital Camera&#8217;s full review is here.</a></p>
<p><strong>Complex says</strong> &#8216;The camera market is over-saturated, but this little dark shooter is a keeper. When people see the photos, they&#8217;ll be like, &#8220;You took THAT with THIS?&#8221;&#8216; <a href="http://www.complex.com/blogs/2010/09/03/focus-feature-the-canon-powershot-s95-review/">See why Complex thinks that the S95 is keeper.<br />
</a><br />
<strong>TechRadar says</strong> &#8216;Impressive. Most impressive.&#8217; <a href="http://www.techradar.com/news/photography-video-capture/cameras/hands-on-canon-powershot-s95-review-711245">More than three words available here.</a></p>
<p><strong>Will Burrard-Lucas says</strong> &#8216;The image quality is great for a compact and I like the fast wide-angle lens. Finally the ease of use of the manual controls is exactly what I was looking for. There are a few things that the camera is missing such as an optical viewfinder, a hot shoe for an external flash and a better zoom, but these omissions are what help make the camera so small so I can live with them.&#8217; <a href="http://blog.burrard-lucas.com/reviews/canon-powershot-s95-review/">Will&#8217;s full review, together with pictures, can be enjoyed here.<br />
</a></p>
<p>All of this for £399 (€479 or $400). <a href="http://www.canon.co.uk/For_Home/Product_Finder/Cameras/Digital_Camera/PowerShot/PowerShot_S95/">Canon</a> can help you out more. </p>
<p><small>Pictures thanks to Will Burrard-Lucas.</small></p>
    <h3>Copyright Information</h3>     <p> Please note that all <a href="http://smallaperture.com">Small Aperture</a> content is &copy; 2009-2010 <strong><a href="http://kamps.org/consulting">Kamps Consulting Ltd</a></strong>. This RSS feed is provided for personal, non-commercial use only.</p>     <p> If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator or RSS reader, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. If you spot this, please contact <a href="mailto:legal@kamps.org">legal@kamps.org</a> so we can take legal action immediately.     <small>sarss31283940 / 20100906</small>    ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smallaperture.com/canon-s95-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon 7D reviews round-up</title>
		<link>http://smallaperture.com/canon-7d-review/</link>
		<comments>http://smallaperture.com/canon-7d-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Haje Jan Kamps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera Review Round-ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon 7d]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smallaperture.com/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the reviews are anything to go by (and, well, they generally are), it&#8217;s looking like the new Canon EOS 7D is turning out to be a right peach &#8211; Competitively priced, it&#8217;s as close to a professional camera as what most of us will need &#8211; and it&#8217;s rather impressive indeed. I&#8217;ve done a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the reviews are anything to go by (and, well, they generally are), it&#8217;s looking like the new Canon EOS 7D is turning out to be a right peach &#8211; Competitively priced, it&#8217;s as close to a professional camera as what most of us will need &#8211; and it&#8217;s rather impressive indeed. I&#8217;ve done a round-up of some of the reviews that&#8217;ve been posted out there so far, and it&#8217;s looking rather good. Check it out: <span id="more-32"></span></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-0188057227511508";
/* 468x60, created 07/11/09 */
google_ad_slot = "8302425150";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>
<p><strong>DPreview says</strong> &#8220;The Canon EOS 7D is a camera that can convince in all areas, and at its current pricing is going to be a very serious competitor for Nikon&#8217;s flagship APS-C DSLR, the D300S&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos7d/">read the full review</a></p>
<p><strong>PhotographyBlog says</strong> &#8220;When the Canon EOS 7D was announced at the beginning of September 2009, many people instantly dismissed it because of the lack of a full-frame sensor. On closer inspection, that seems to be their loss, as the 7D is a fantastic APS-C DSLR&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/canon_eos_7d_review/">read the full review on PhotographyBlog</a></p>
<p><strong>Imaging Resource says</strong> &#8220;This is the camera that Canon enthusiasts, indeed many camera enthusiasts, have been waiting for.&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/E7D/E7DA.HTM">read the full Canon EOS 7D review on Imaging Resource</a></p>
<p><strong>TechRadar says</strong> &#8220;The 7D&#8217;s high-ISO performance is hardly bad, and compared to the 5D MKII it&#8217;s £200 cheaper, offers twice the maximum frame rate and a significantly more advanced auto-focus system.&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://www.techradar.com/reviews/cameras-and-camcorders/cameras/digital-slrs/canon-7d-642994/review">Read the full review on Tech Radar</a></p>
<p><strong>Photo.net</strong> says &#8220;The EOS 7D boasts significant EOS advancements including a completely new 19-point Autofocus system, a new Canon iFCL Metering System (Intelligent Focus, Color, Luminance) and a new Intelligent Viewfinder&#8221; &#8211; Read <a href="http://photo.net/equipment/canon/eos-7d/preview/">the full review</a></p>
<p><strong>Camera Labs says</strong> &#8220;The EOS 7D is pitched directly against the D300s and clearly intends to become the new high-end cropped body of choice. As such it’s not surprising to find Canon equipping the 7D with a higher resolution sensor along with the addition of more movie modes&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon_EOS_7D/">check out their full review</a></p>
<p><strong>CameraTechnology</strong> has a video review, too: </p>
<p><object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0we5RTxuZjU&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0we5RTxuZjU&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object></p>
    <h3>Copyright Information</h3>     <p> Please note that all <a href="http://smallaperture.com">Small Aperture</a> content is &copy; 2009-2010 <strong><a href="http://kamps.org/consulting">Kamps Consulting Ltd</a></strong>. This RSS feed is provided for personal, non-commercial use only.</p>     <p> If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator or RSS reader, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. If you spot this, please contact <a href="mailto:legal@kamps.org">legal@kamps.org</a> so we can take legal action immediately.     <small>sarss31283940 / 20100906</small>    ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smallaperture.com/canon-7d-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
