<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Small Aperture &#187; Meta News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smallaperture.com/category/news/meta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smallaperture.com</link>
	<description>Photography news with a greater depth of field</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:42:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Welcome to Small Aperture</title>
		<link>http://smallaperture.com/welcome-to-small-aperture/</link>
		<comments>http://smallaperture.com/welcome-to-small-aperture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Haje Jan Kamps</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meta News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photocritic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Aperture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smallaperture.com/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to Small Aperture!
&#8220;Why the hell&#8221;, I see you think, &#8220;is that Photocritic guy starting another site? Isn&#8217;t Photocritic popular enough? Is there no limits to his megalomania?&#8221; 
The answers, respectively, in reverse order, are &#8216;Not really&#8217;, &#8216;Never&#8217;, and &#8216;Because I think there&#8217;s something to be said for a photography new site which can do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to Small Aperture!</p>
<p>&#8220;Why the hell&#8221;, I see you think, &#8220;is that <a href="http://photocritic.org">Photocritic</a> guy starting another site? Isn&#8217;t Photocritic popular enough? Is there no limits to his megalomania?&#8221; </p>
<p>The answers, respectively, in reverse order, are &#8216;Not really&#8217;, &#8216;Never&#8217;, and &#8216;Because I think there&#8217;s something to be said for a photography new site which can do things firmly tongue-in-cheek, with a bit of humour, a lot of insight, and some creativity&#8217;. <span id="more-3"></span></p>
<p>I briefly considered adding the concept of higher-frequency news-with-insight to Photocritic, but frankly, that&#8217;s not what PC is all about &#8211; So, rest assured, Photocritic will continue being the in-depth, feature-articles where you can learn cool stuff about photography. Here on Small Aperture, things&#8217;ll be much in the same style as Photocritic (so: Largely nonsensical, occasionally funny, and with opinion galore), but a little bit more rapid-fire. You know it makes sense.</p>
<p>Welcome aboard!</p>
    <h3>Copyright Information</h3>     <p> Please note that all <a href="http://smallaperture.com">Small Aperture</a> content is &copy; 2009-2010 <strong><a href="http://kamps.org/consulting">Kamps Consulting Ltd</a></strong>. This RSS feed is provided for personal, non-commercial use only.</p>     <p> If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator or RSS reader, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. If you spot this, please contact <a href="mailto:legal@kamps.org">legal@kamps.org</a> so we can take legal action immediately.     <small>sarss31283940 / 20100906</small>    ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://smallaperture.com/welcome-to-small-aperture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
